From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S265586AbUABPlX (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 2 Jan 2004 10:41:23 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265587AbUABPlX
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 2 Jan 2004 10:41:23 -0500
Received: from web9804.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.129.214]:56631 "HELO
	web9804.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id S265586AbUABPlQ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 2 Jan 2004 10:41:16 -0500
Message-ID: <20040102154114.42231.qmail@web9804.mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 07:41:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Robert Mena <rt_mena@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fair scheduling in 2.4 ?
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

Back in the days of kernel 2.2 there was a patch (from
Rik van Riel if I recall) to the kernel so no single
user could use all available cpu.

I was wondering if this feature (or something like it)
has been ported or integrated in 2.4.x series ?

regards,
rt

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003
http://search.yahoo.com/top2003