From: Martin Knoblauch <knobi@knobisoft.de>
To: linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Any changes in Multicast code between 2.4.20 and 2.4.22/23 ? -> New Info
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:24:12 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040107192412.36719.qmail@web13910.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFDDD008B9.906B9BD6-ON88256E14.0038B2E4@us.ibm.com>
Hi David,
last message on this issue for today. By inserting printk's I could
show that the packets from the "external" Ganglia/gmond clients never
show up in the "udp_rcv" routine when running the 2.4.22 kernel. So it
seems something goes amiss when receiving certain UDP packets.
Unfortunatelly this exhausts my clues about the dataflow of ipv4. Next
question from me would be who calls "udp_rcv", or would such call be
dispatched from the inet_protos table.
Cheers
Martin
--- David Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> BTW, one other thing to try with this new information-- if it works
> with
> 224.0.0.1 (the all-hosts group), then I'd assume it is not a problem
> with
> the bind() or an issue with multicast delivery.
>
> If that's true, it may be a problem with the driver multicast address
> filter,
> then I'd expect it to not receive anything on the receiver side when
> using
> "tcpdump -i ethX" but it should work if you put the interface in
> promiscuous
> mode with "tcpdump -p -i ethX" (ie, add the "-p" option to tcpdump on
> the
> receiver and see if it works then). Can you try that?
>
> Also, if you have any other network cards you could plug in to test
> with
> that are not tg3's, it'd be useful to test with those.
>
> +-DLS
>
>
> Martin Knoblauch <knobi@knobisoft.de>@vger.kernel.org on 01/07/2004
> 02:10:28 AM
>
> Please respond to knobi@knobisoft.de
>
> Sent by: linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org
>
>
> To: linux-net@vger.kernel.org
> cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David
> Stevens/Beaverton/IBM@IBMUS
> Subject:
>
>
>
> >
> > To rule out further causes, I rebuilt the 2.4.21 version of tg3.o
> >(V1.5) for the 2.4.22 kernel (tg3-V1.6). Unfortunatelly the problem
> did
> >not go away, which point into the direction of the pretty large
> >igmp/multicast changes introduced with 2.4.22. Debugging tg3 would
> have
> >been easier ...
>
> Next tidbit: the problem comes when using a multicast group
> different
> from 224.0.0.1. If I change the group used by Ganglia from
> 239.2.11.71
> to 224.0.0.1 all of a sudden the multicasts come in.
>
> Hope this helps the specialists to track it down.
>
=====
------------------------------------------------------
Martin Knoblauch
email: k n o b i AT knobisoft DOT de
www: http://www.knobisoft.de
next parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-07 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <OFDDD008B9.906B9BD6-ON88256E14.0038B2E4@us.ibm.com>
2004-01-07 19:24 ` Martin Knoblauch [this message]
[not found] <OFF9934921.DF9DB0E3-ON88256E15.00658D89@us.ibm.com>
2004-01-09 8:37 ` Martin Knoblauch
[not found] <OFFB53E1E3.C0B1F8BC-ON88256E14.003560C9@us.ibm.com>
2004-01-07 14:08 ` Martin Knoblauch
2004-01-08 18:03 ` Martin Knoblauch
2004-01-07 10:27 Martin Knoblauch
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-07 9:28 Martin Knoblauch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040107192412.36719.qmail@web13910.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=knobi@knobisoft.de \
--cc=dlstevens@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®