mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Slusky <sluskyb@paranoiacs.org>
To: Ruben Garcia <ruben@ugr.es>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trivial@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: [PATCH] Re: loop device changes the block size and causes misaligned accesses to the real device, which can't be processed
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 23:04:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040108040414.GA5017@fukurou.paranoiacs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FFC3BF4.6080105@ugr.es>

On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 18:03:48 +0100, Ruben Garcia wrote:
> The loop device advertises a block size of 1024 even when configured 
> over a cdrom.
> 
> When burning a ext2 on a cd, and mounting it directly, I get:
> 
> blocksize=2048;
> 
> when I losetup /dev/loop0 /dev/cdrom, and then try to mount, I get:
> 
> blocksize=1024; and then misaligned transfer; this results in not being 
> able to read the superblock.
> 
> The loop device should be changed to export the same blocksize of the 
> underlying device

Huh, if you look at loop.c it appears to do that already (line 735) but
it doesn't. This patch makes it so.

--- linux-2.6.0/drivers/block/loop.c-orig	2004-01-07 22:47:37.755375858 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.0/drivers/block/loop.c	2004-01-07 22:48:04.990990082 -0500
@@ -732,8 +732,6 @@
 	mapping_set_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping,
 			     lo->old_gfp_mask & ~(__GFP_IO|__GFP_FS));
 
-	set_blocksize(bdev, lo_blocksize);
-
 	lo->lo_bio = lo->lo_biotail = NULL;
 
 	/*
@@ -749,6 +747,7 @@
 	if (S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode)) {
 		request_queue_t *q = bdev_get_queue(lo_device);
 
+		blk_queue_hardsect_size(lo->lo_queue, q->hardsect_size);
 		blk_queue_max_sectors(lo->lo_queue, q->max_sectors);
 		blk_queue_max_phys_segments(lo->lo_queue,q->max_phys_segments);
 		blk_queue_max_hw_segments(lo->lo_queue, q->max_hw_segments);
@@ -757,6 +756,8 @@
 		blk_queue_merge_bvec(lo->lo_queue, q->merge_bvec_fn);
 	}
 
+	set_blocksize(bdev, lo_blocksize);
+
 	kernel_thread(loop_thread, lo, CLONE_KERNEL);
 	down(&lo->lo_sem);
 
HTH,

-- 
Ben Slusky                      | The doctors x-rayed my head
sluskyb@paranoiacs.org          | and found nothing.
sluskyb@stwing.org              |               -Dizzy Dean
PGP keyID ADA44B3B      

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-01-08  4:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-07 17:03 Ruben Garcia
2004-01-07 18:12 ` loop device changes the block size and causes misaligned accessesto " Jari Ruusu
2004-01-12  4:12   ` Bill Davidsen
2004-01-08  4:04 ` Ben Slusky [this message]
2004-01-08 10:45   ` [PATCH] Re: loop device changes the block size and causes misaligned accesses to " Ruben Garcia
2004-01-12 14:12     ` Ruben Garcia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040108040414.GA5017@fukurou.paranoiacs.org \
    --to=sluskyb@paranoiacs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ruben@ugr.es \
    --cc=trivial@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®