From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
To: Martin Schlemmer <azarah@nosferatu.za.org>,
John Lash <jlash@speakeasy.net>
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Q re /proc/bus/i2c
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:15:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200401101415.46745.gene.heskett@verizon.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1073758800.9096.12.camel@nosferatu.lan>
On Saturday 10 January 2004 13:20, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
>On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 17:59, John Lash wrote:
>> In a 2.6.x kernel, the sensors information is kept in sysfs. I
>> haven't actually tried installing lmsensors on my 2.6 system, but
>> if I look in: /sys/bus/i2c/devices/0-002d/
>> I can see files for all of the sensors on my system.
>>
>> Check below in your last mail where it is complaining about
>> "Algorithm: Unavailable from sysfs".
>
>Right, needs sysfs mounted. You should (after creating /sys) add
>the following to /etc/fstab:
>
>--
>none /sys sysfs defaults 0 0
>--
>From my fstab, and its been there for several months now:
---
none /sys sysfs defaults 0 0
---
Also, from my mtab:
Well, I was gonna quote that too, but apparently my entry in
rc.sysinit doesn't record it in mtab. I've got a message in the log
to the effect that its already mounted or is otherwise busy. I'd put
that line in rc.sysinit a few (2-3) weeks ago, thinking it needed to
be done earlier than the fstab driven mount. I'll remove it from
rc.sysinit and reboot for effects.
Done.
I also moved the mount of /proc/bus/usb to fstab while I was at it,
and they are all recorded in mtab now:
---
none /proc/bus/usb usbfs rw 0 0
none /sys sysfs rw 0 0
---
But the response from sensors is still as I posted before, "Algorithm:
Unavailable from sysfs"
tvtime still works, so thats promising. Sounds like they (the Feed
Bag Information folks) got something/someone(s) trapped on a plane at
Dulles according to FOX News, who are of course makeing the usual
mountain out of whats probably a molehill.
Next thing to check?
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap,
ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-10 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-10 6:17 Gene Heskett
2004-01-10 1:47 ` J. Ryan Earl
2004-01-10 12:54 ` Gene Heskett
2004-01-10 11:58 ` J. Ryan Earl
2004-01-10 18:40 ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-01-10 17:32 ` J. Ryan Earl
2004-01-10 20:35 ` Gene Heskett
2004-01-10 20:56 ` Gene Heskett
2004-01-10 17:51 ` J. Ryan Earl
2004-01-10 15:59 ` John Lash
2004-01-10 18:12 ` Gene Heskett
2004-01-10 18:20 ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-01-10 19:15 ` Gene Heskett [this message]
2004-01-10 19:40 ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-01-10 23:14 ` Gene Heskett
2004-01-10 20:57 ` Gene Heskett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200401101415.46745.gene.heskett@verizon.net \
--to=gene.heskett@verizon.net \
--cc=azarah@nosferatu.za.org \
--cc=jlash@speakeasy.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®