mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: modprobe failed: digest_null
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:03:19 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040113150319.1e309dcb.rddunlap@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040113225047.GA6891@piper.madduck.net>

On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:50:47 +0100 martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net> wrote:

| also sprach Randy.Dunlap <rddunlap@osdl.org> [2004.01.13.2341 +0100]:
| > I would guess that you have a high-priority $PATH to old modprobe
| > than to the new modprobe...
| 
| That would surprise me, Debian handles this quite well:
| 
| diamond:~# which modprobe
| /sbin/modprobe
| diamond:~# modprobe -V
| module-init-tools version 3.0-pre5
| diamond:~# modprobe.modutils -V
| modprobe version 2.4.26
| modprobe: QM_MODULES: Function not implemented
| diamond:~# uname -r
| 2.6.1

OK, maybe someone else has an answer then.

The message:
kernel: request_module: failed /sbin/modprobe -- digest_null. error = 256
is from modutils and not from module-init-tools according to my
source files.

--
~Randy
MOTD:  Always include version info.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-13 23:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-13 21:53 martin f krafft
2004-01-13 22:30 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-01-13 22:37   ` martin f krafft
2004-01-13 22:41     ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-01-13 22:50       ` martin f krafft
2004-01-13 23:03         ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2004-01-13 23:38           ` David Rees
2004-01-14  0:01             ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-01-14  0:59               ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-01-14  0:08             ` martin f krafft
2004-01-14  1:05               ` David Rees
2004-01-14 23:48             ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-01-15  0:46               ` Stian Jordet
2004-01-15  8:50               ` martin f krafft
2004-01-14  1:26           ` Steve Youngs
2004-01-14  1:31             ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-01-14  8:45               ` martin f krafft
2004-01-16 15:55           ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-01-14 23:22 ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-15  8:08   ` martin f krafft
2004-01-15 16:30     ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-01-15 20:51       ` Andreas Schrell
2004-01-19  4:53       ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040113150319.1e309dcb.rddunlap@osdl.org \
    --to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome