mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Hockin <thockin@hockin.org>
To: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Cc: vatsa@in.ibm.com, Rusty Russell <rusty@au1.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org,
	rml@tech9.net
Subject: Re: CPU Hotplug: Hotplug Script And SIGPWR
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 23:42:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040121074238.GB2078@hockin.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <400E2ABA.2060809@cyberone.com.au>

On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 06:31:06PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >If hotplug scripts are failing, you're in really deep trouble.  I can't 
> >find
> >a single case where a hotplug script failing would not indicate some other
> >larger failure.
> >
> 
> sigh. threads-max, pid_max, ulimit, -ENOMEM, oom.

These affect ALL hotplug scripts.  If you can't run a hotplug script because
you've exceeded root's ulimit, or the max # of tasks/threads in the system,
you're in trouble - regardless of what the hotplug event was - SOMETHING is
going to go wrong.

If you get ENOMEM you have a bigger problem.

If you get OOM killed, then the OOM killer has gone haywire (not uncommon,
historically).

> I'd rather not add something that, by design can hang any number of 
> processes
> including the entire system if a hotplug script fails. Thats just my honest
> opinion, I know its rare enough it probably would never happen to anyone.
> 
> Sorry I keep repeating this, its not my call and its never going to affect
> me so I'll shut up now ;)

I'd rather not add anything like that either.  I'm not saying I advocate
fast-and-loose at all.  On the contrary, I think any action taken in
response to a CPU removal needs to be accountable, and wantonly changing
affinity is NOT.

It'll probably not affect me either, nor is it my decision :)

  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-21  7:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20040116174446.A2820@in.ibm.com>
2004-01-20  5:44 ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-20  6:33   ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-20  6:43     ` Nick Piggin
2004-01-20  6:52       ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-20  7:11         ` Nick Piggin
2004-01-20  7:30           ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-20  7:45             ` Nick Piggin
2004-01-20  7:54               ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-20  8:14                 ` Nick Piggin
2004-01-20  8:29                   ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-20  8:37                     ` Nick Piggin
2004-01-20  8:43                       ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-21  4:06                         ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2004-01-21  4:14                           ` Nick Piggin
2004-01-21  5:09                             ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2004-01-21  7:08                               ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-21 15:07                                 ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-01-22  5:29                                 ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-21  7:09                             ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-21  7:31                               ` Nick Piggin
2004-01-21  7:42                                 ` Tim Hockin [this message]
2004-01-21  8:11                             ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-21  5:07                           ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-20  8:41                   ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-01-20  8:49                     ` Nick Piggin
2004-01-20  9:12                       ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-21  0:00                 ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-20 23:51         ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-20  7:45     ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-20  8:37       ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-20  9:29         ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2004-01-21  0:12         ` Rusty Russell
     [not found] <fa.f37o48p.1io5q5@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.frjqvfo.170g8hq@ifi.uio.no>
2004-01-20 17:49   ` Andy Lutomirski
2004-01-21  4:33     ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040121074238.GB2078@hockin.org \
    --to=thockin@hockin.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=rusty@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®