mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: zlynx@acm.org, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: List 'linux-dvb' closed to public posts
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:29:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040121132928.2ce1510f.rddunlap@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040121211550.GK9327@redhat.com>

On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 21:15:50 +0000 Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:

| On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 01:38:19PM -0700, Zan Lynx wrote:
| 
|  > Compared to the time required to write up a good bug report or patch,
|  > what's the problem with the couple minutes needed to subscribe,
|  > authorize and _then_ post to the list?
| 
| Closed lists are just *rude*. The only intention is to stop spam,
| but personally, I find hoop-jumping like this *more* of an inconvenience
| than spam, (and I get a *lot* of spam, several megs a day on a quiet day)

Same here.

| Some maintainers get *really pissed off* when you short-circuit them
| and send fixes to Linus directly.  But if I'm forced to jump through hoops
| each time I fix up random parts of the kernel, I'm going to be equally
| as rude as I consider they are by doing the best they can to inconvenience
| people with good intentions, and mail them straight to Linus/Andrew/Marcelo.

Agreed.  I usually copy such maintainers in private email, but
it's too much hassle to subscribe to a mailing list just to post
one patch, especially if there are other ways to have it merged.

--
~Randy

  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-21 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <ecartis-01212004203954.14209.1@mail.convergence2.de>
2004-01-21 19:43 ` Dave Jones
2004-01-21 19:54   ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-21 19:56   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-21 19:56     ` Dave Jones
2004-01-21 20:12       ` John Bradford
2004-01-21 21:44       ` Jes Sorensen
2004-01-22  5:11         ` Rik van Riel
2004-01-21 20:38     ` Zan Lynx
2004-01-21 20:57       ` Charles Cazabon
2004-01-21 21:57         ` Diego Calleja
2004-01-21 21:15       ` Dave Jones
2004-01-21 21:29         ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2004-01-21 21:30         ` [OT] Confirmation Spam Blocking was: " Mike Fedyk
2004-01-21 22:50           ` Adrian Bunk
2004-01-21 23:01           ` Wakko Warner
2004-01-22  6:51             ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-01-22 14:31               ` Wakko Warner
2004-01-21 23:40           ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2004-01-22  0:26             ` Zan Lynx
2004-01-22  5:14               ` Rik van Riel
2004-01-22 13:24               ` Jes Sorensen
2004-01-22 16:56                 ` David Ford
2004-01-22 17:01                   ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-22 17:10                     ` David Ford
2004-01-22 17:35                       ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-22 18:18                       ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2004-01-22 17:11                   ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2004-01-22 17:30                   ` viro
2004-01-22 17:34                     ` Ralf Hildebrandt
2004-01-22 17:41                     ` David Ford
2004-01-22 18:20                       ` Brian Beattie
2004-01-23  7:41                         ` Willy Tarreau
2004-01-23  9:24                         ` Paul Jakma
2004-01-22 18:35                   ` David Lang
2004-01-22 18:49                     ` David Ford
2004-01-22 22:18                       ` jw schultz
2004-01-22 22:58                         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-22 23:16                           ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-23  6:49                           ` David S. Miller
2004-01-23 15:38                             ` Chris Ricker
2004-01-23  9:25                           ` Paul Jakma
2004-01-23 19:38                           ` Pavel Machek
2004-01-22 22:43                     ` Scott Laird
2004-01-24 20:14                     ` Kevin O'Connor
2004-01-24 21:12                       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-24 23:25                         ` Kevin O'Connor
     [not found]                       ` <1hDmg-4AP-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-01-24 23:59                         ` Russ Allbery
2004-01-22 22:15                   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2004-01-23  8:43                   ` Jes Sorensen
2004-01-26 22:58                     ` Max Valdez
2004-01-23  9:17                   ` Paul Jakma
2004-01-22  5:13           ` Rik van Riel
2004-01-21 23:08         ` Russell King
2004-01-22 13:28           ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-01-21 22:13       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-21 23:01         ` Marcus Metzler
2004-01-22 14:14           ` Johannes Stezenbach
2004-01-22 15:14             ` Marcus Metzler
2004-01-22 15:31               ` Johannes Stezenbach
2004-01-21 23:21         ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-01-22 15:15     ` Michael Hunold
2004-01-22 15:18       ` Dave Jones
2004-01-21 20:08   ` Valdis.Kletnieks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040121132928.2ce1510f.rddunlap@osdl.org \
    --to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=zlynx@acm.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome