From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266472AbUAVXJp (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2004 18:09:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266475AbUAVXJp (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2004 18:09:45 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:1454 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266472AbUAVXJn (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2004 18:09:43 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:09:37 -0800 From: Chris Wright To: Nico Schottelius , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: security patches / lsm Message-ID: <20040122150937.A8720@osdlab.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20040122191158.GA1207@schottelius.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20040122191158.GA1207@schottelius.org>; from nico-kernel@schottelius.org on Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 08:11:58PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Nico Schottelius (nico-kernel@schottelius.org) wrote: > What about the LSM framework in the kernel and the arguments at > http://www.rsbac.org/lsm.htm > http://www.grsecurity.net/lsm.php It's been fairly functional for something as comprehenseive as SELinux, and supports other users as well, LIDS, DTE come to mind. There are probably some improvements we could make from a few of the complaints from these projects, however they haven't contacted the lsm list in years. > Are you working together with those maintainers to enable their > patches? No. They've both said they don't want to spend any time on such endeavor. I think it would be time well spent, perhaps you'd like to help? thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net