mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: JG <jg@cms.ac>
To: Lincoln Dale <ltd@cisco.com>
Cc: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TG3: very high CPU usage
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 14:43:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040124134334.A0BF9202CA0@23.cms.ac> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040122125516.7B671202CDC@23.cms.ac>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2429 bytes --]

hi,

> i'm also going to test my systems with ttcp, because at the moment i'm transferring my backup from the server to my machine with 105.48 kB/s over the gigabit line via ftp :( but cpu is normal on both machines.

i did some tests now, here are the results.
box1 = 2.6.0 (tg3 driver v2.3, nov5/03)
box2 = 2.6.2-rc1-mm2 (tg3 v2.5, dec22/03)

box1 was sending, box2 receiving:

box1 # ttcp -t -l 65536 -v -b 2097152 -s -D -n100000 192.168.0.3
ttcp-t: buflen=65536, nbuf=100000, align=16384/0, port=5001, sockbufsize=2097152  tcp  -> 192.168.0.3
ttcp-t: socket
ttcp-t: sndbuf
ttcp-t: nodelay
ttcp-t: connect
ttcp-t: -2036334592 bytes in 1247.57 real seconds = 1768.00 KB/sec +++
ttcp-t: -2036334592 bytes in 30.01 CPU seconds = 73492.73 KB/cpu sec
ttcp-t: 100000 I/O calls, msec/call = 12.78, calls/sec = 80.16
ttcp-t: 0.1user 29.8sys 20:47real 2% 0i+0d 0maxrss 1+16pf 67585+105csw
ttcp-t: buffer address 0x807c000

------------------------------------------
now the opposite, box2 was sending, box1 receiving:

box2 ttcp # ttcp -t -l 65536 -v -b 2097152 -s -D -n100000 192.168.0.2
ttcp-t: buflen=65536, nbuf=100000, align=16384/0, port=5001, sockbufsize=2097152  tcp  -> 192.168.0.2
ttcp-t: socket
ttcp-t: sndbuf
ttcp-t: nodelay
ttcp-t: connect
ttcp-t: -2036334592 bytes in 153.82 real seconds = 14339.52 KB/sec +++
ttcp-t: -2036334592 bytes in 28.61 CPU seconds = 77085.45 KB/cpu sec
ttcp-t: 100000 I/O calls, msec/call = 1.58, calls/sec = 650.11
ttcp-t: 0.1user 28.4sys 2:33real 18% 0i+0d 0maxrss 0+17pf 63153+846csw
ttcp-t: buffer address 0x807c000

i thought the cable could be defective because of the results, but i tested with another machine (windows xp, 100mbit card) and both up and download speed via ftp (from both boxes!) was at about 8-9MB/s. so no problem with the cable and it seems also no problem with 100mbit, but as soon as i connect the two tg3 cards together with 1000mbit, one direction is slow (cable is gbit certified and worked with 2.4 kernels without any problem).

as i already mentionend in a previous email, the errors on the tg3 cards are quite high, but only in RX:
box1:
RX packets:18585312 errors:102500 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:102598
TX packets:12435471 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
box2:
RX packets:6864695 errors:202162 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:204652
TX packets:10049776 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

cpu usage was also normal in every test (about 15-30%).

JG

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-24 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-19  3:35 Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-01-20 12:33 ` JG
2004-01-20 23:13   ` Lincoln Dale
2004-01-21  3:19     ` Tom Sightler
2004-01-22  3:57       ` Lincoln Dale
2004-01-22 12:55         ` JG
2004-01-24 13:43           ` JG [this message]
2004-01-25  0:03             ` Lincoln Dale
2004-01-25 12:31               ` JG
2004-01-31  9:15                 ` JG
2004-02-01  0:20                   ` Lincoln Dale
2004-02-07 18:26                     ` JG
2004-02-08  0:00                       ` Lincoln Dale
2004-02-09 10:13                         ` JG
2004-01-22 16:06         ` Tom Sightler
     [not found] <fa.eu7l1gd.ekqe1j@ifi.uio.no>
2004-01-19 11:32 ` Andreas Hartmann
2004-01-20  3:54   ` Mark Williams (MWP)
     [not found] <fa.g9joqss.1nneajs@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.e29fqcc.sick10@ifi.uio.no>
2004-01-20  9:17   ` Andreas Hartmann
2004-01-20  9:44     ` Lincoln Dale
2004-01-20 10:16       ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-01-20 12:09         ` Lincoln Dale

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040124134334.A0BF9202CA0@23.cms.ac \
    --to=jg@cms.ac \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltd@cisco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome