From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261492AbUA3JyJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jan 2004 04:54:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261784AbUA3JyJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jan 2004 04:54:09 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.de ([213.165.64.20]:59293 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261492AbUA3JyH (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jan 2004 04:54:07 -0500 X-Authenticated: #222435 Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:54:30 +0100 From: Jonas Diemer Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Which interface: sysfs, proc, devfs? Message-Id: <20040130105430.1e6ada9a.diemer@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <20040129230250.GA9988@kroah.com> References: <20040129222813.3b22b2c8.diemer@gmx.de> <20040129230250.GA9988@kroah.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:02:50 -0800 Greg KH wrote: > What about not writing a kernel driver at all and just using > libusb/usbfs? Any reason you have to have a kernel driver for your > device? Well, didn't think about that, but it indeed seems more logical. Thanks for the hint. regards Jonas PS: CC me in replies, please