From: BlaisorBlade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@osdl.org
Subject: [PATCH] loop.c doesn't fail init gracefully
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 20:01:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200402012001.12911.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 947 bytes --]
I'm reposting this patch (which was included in 2.6.0-mm1 and then dropped)
since it is not clear why it was dropped in 2.6.0-mm2 (maybe I'm wrong, maybe
it was lost/I was not clear); but the bugs are still there (at least in stock
2.6.1).
THIS PATCH:
loop_init doesn't fail gracefully for two reasons:
1)If initialization of loop driver fails, we have an call to devfs_add("loop")
without any devfs_remove; I add that.
2) On lwn.net 2.6 kernel docs, Jonathan Corbet says:
"If you are calling add_disk() in your driver initialization routine, you
should not fail the initialization process after the first call."
Also, if that is not invalid, then we would need to call del_gendisk on
failure. So the fix I post is the simplest one.
So I make loop.c conform to this request by moving add_disk after all memory
allocations.
CC me on reply as I'm not subscribed, please.
Thanks for attention.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
[-- Attachment #2: B-01-Loop_loadFailed_fix.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 608 bytes --]
--- ./drivers/block/loop.c.nofix 2003-12-11 19:37:08.000000000 +0100
+++ ./drivers/block/loop.c 2003-12-11 19:46:43.000000000 +0100
@@ -1212,14 +1212,18 @@
sprintf(disk->devfs_name, "loop/%d", i);
disk->private_data = lo;
disk->queue = lo->lo_queue;
- add_disk(disk);
}
+
+ /* We cannot fail after we call this, so another loop!*/
+ for (i = 0; i < max_loop; i++)
+ add_disk(disks[i]);
printk(KERN_INFO "loop: loaded (max %d devices)\n", max_loop);
return 0;
out_mem4:
while (i--)
blk_put_queue(loop_dev[i].lo_queue);
+ devfs_remove("loop");
i = max_loop;
out_mem3:
while (i--)
next reply other threads:[~2004-02-02 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-01 19:01 BlaisorBlade [this message]
2004-02-02 19:33 ` [PATCH] loop.c doesn't fail init gracefully (sorry, already applied) BlaisorBlade
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-24 12:26 [PATCH] loop.c doesn't fail init gracefully BlaisorBlade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200402012001.12911.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--to=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®