From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265423AbUBAUvV (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 15:51:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265427AbUBAUvV (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 15:51:21 -0500 Received: from mail.zmailer.org ([62.78.96.67]:10946 "EHLO mail.zmailer.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265423AbUBAUvQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 15:51:16 -0500 Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 22:51:15 +0200 From: Matti Aarnio To: Markus =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=E4stbacka?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Uptime counter Message-ID: <20040201205115.GS2259@mea-ext.zmailer.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 10:41:41PM +0200, Markus Hästbacka wrote: > Hi list, > I wonder does any kernel branch have a uptime counter that doesn't stop > counting at 497 days? Or is a patch needed for the job to > 2.{0,2,4,6} kernel? Any 64 bit machine since day 1, but also 2.6 at i386 does work. > Markus /Matti Aarnio