From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@mail.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Jim Faulkner <jfaulkne@ccs.neu.edu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG under 2.6.1-mm5
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:40:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040204154044.A19543@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040201190905.GA3873@localhost.localdomain>; from arvidjaar@mail.ru on Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 10:09:05PM +0300
> good. here is extended version that includes the same fix + some
> cleanup. It removes dead code, removes long obsolete attempt to manage
> module refcounting, unifies bdev and cdev - they are treated equal now.
>
> andrew please consider for -mm for testing.
>
> More cleanup will follow.
-struct bdev_type
-{
- dev_t dev;
-};
-
-struct cdev_type
-{
- struct file_operations *ops;
- dev_t dev;
- unsigned char autogen:1;
-};
Okay, this cleanup is nice, but could you separate it from the bugfixes?
+ * TODO it must be called asynchronously due to the fact
+ * that devfs is initialized relatively late. Proper way
+ * is to remove module_init from init_devfs_fs and manually
+ * call it early enough during system init
What about doing this? This lazy initialization scheme always
bothere me..
+ /*
+ * FIXME HACK
+ *
+ * make sure that
+ * d_instantiate always runs under lock
+ * we release i_sem lock before going to sleep
+ *
+ * unfortunately sometimes d_revalidate is called with
+ * and sometimes without i_sem lock held. The following checks
+ * attempt to deduce when we need to add (and drop resp.) lock
+ * here. This relies on current (2.6.2) calling coventions:
+ *
+ * lookup_hash is always run under i_sem and is passing NULL
+ * as nd
+ *
+ * open(...,O_CREATE,...) calls _lookup_hash under i_sem
+ * and sets flags to LOOKUP_OPEN|LOOKUP_CREATE
+ *
+ * all other invocations of ->d_revalidate seem to happen
+ * outside of i_sem
+ */
+ need_lock = nd &&
+ (!(nd->flags & LOOKUP_CREATE) || (nd->flags & LOOKUP_PARENT));
+
+ if (need_lock)
+ down(&dir->i_sem);
Yikes! Don't do such hacks, they will stop working sooner or later.
I'd rather add i_sem to all calls to ->d_revalidate in a way that punish
filesystems not having ->d_revalidate than such a hack
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-04 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-21 22:23 Jim Faulkner
2004-01-21 22:48 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-26 15:30 ` Andrey Borzenkov
2004-01-26 21:22 ` Jim Faulkner
2004-02-01 19:09 ` Andrey Borzenkov
2004-02-04 15:40 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040204154044.A19543@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arvidjaar@mail.ru \
--cc=jfaulkne@ccs.neu.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome