From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266706AbUBEUN0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2004 15:13:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266796AbUBEUN0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2004 15:13:26 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:61397 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266706AbUBEUNO (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2004 15:13:14 -0500 Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:14:57 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Ben Collins Cc: greg@kroah.com, robert@gadsdon.giointernet.co.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: 2.6.2-mm1 aka "Geriatric Wombat" Message-Id: <20040205121457.50d2be05.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040205182928.GA1042@phunnypharm.org> References: <402240F9.3050607@gadsdon.giointernet.co.uk> <20040205182614.GG13075@kroah.com> <20040205182928.GA1042@phunnypharm.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ben Collins wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 10:26:14AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 01:11:21PM +0000, Robert Gadsdon wrote: > > > 2.6.2-mm1 tombstone "Badness in kobject_get....." when booting: > > > > Oooh, not nice. That means a kobject is being used before it has been > > initialized. Glad to see that check finally helps out... > > > > > ieee1394: Host added: ID:BUS[0-00:1023] GUID[090050c50000046f] > > > Badness in kobject_get at lib/kobject.c:431 > > > Call Trace: > > > [] kobject_get+0x36/0x40 > > > [] get_device+0x13/0x20 > > > [] bus_for_each_dev+0x59/0xc0 > > > [] nodemgr_node_probe+0x55/0x120 [ieee1394] > > > [] nodemgr_probe_ne_cb+0x0/0x90 [ieee1394] > > > [] nodemgr_host_thread+0x168/0x190 [ieee1394] > > > [] nodemgr_host_thread+0x0/0x190 [ieee1394] > > > [] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x10 > > > > Looks like one of the ieee1394 patches causes this. Ben? > > Andrew, does 2.6.2-mm1 have that big ieee1394 patch, or is this the same > as stock 2.6.2? 2.6.2-mm1 has no ieee1394 patch - it's the same as 2.6.2, apart from some tweaks to eth1394.c from Jeff. (It was _supposed_ to have the big patch, but I mucked up somewhere and lost it)