From: Troy Benjegerdes <hozer@hozed.org>
To: "Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@intel.com>
Cc: infiniband-general@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Infiniband-general] Getting an Infiniband access layer in theLinux kernel
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 11:27:09 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040206172709.GT11222@kalmia.hozed.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C1B7430B33A4B14F80D29B5126C5E9470326258C@orsmsx401.jf.intel.com>
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 08:42:14AM -0800, Hefty, Sean wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2004 at 05:11:00PM -0800, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 02:26:46PM -0800, Hefty, Sean wrote:
> >> Personally, I'm amazed that professional developers have to discuss
> or
> >> defend modular, portable code.
> >
> >You're new to linux-kernel, aren't you? ;)
>
> I was not trying to be condescending. My point was that I think that
> everyone on this list knows the purpose and benefits behind an
> abstraction layer. It's not something that needed to be discussed any
> further.
I attempting to make a (poor) joke on the contiual flamewars that happen
on open-source development projects.
I think someone's said something like this before, but..
"Nothing useful ever gets done on linux-kernel without a good flamewar"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-06 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-06 16:42 Hefty, Sean
2004-02-06 17:05 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-06 17:23 ` Roland Dreier
2004-02-06 18:00 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-06 18:12 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-06 18:13 ` Chris Friesen
2004-02-06 18:22 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-02-06 18:50 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-06 19:02 ` Matti Aarnio
2004-02-06 19:11 ` Petr Vandrovec
2004-02-07 3:05 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-06 18:54 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-06 19:01 ` somenath
2004-02-06 17:27 ` Troy Benjegerdes [this message]
2004-02-06 18:51 ` Greg KH
2004-02-08 8:31 ` Fab Tillier
2004-02-08 16:29 ` Greg KH
2004-02-08 16:51 ` Fab Tillier
2004-02-09 2:55 ` Troy Benjegerdes
2004-02-09 2:57 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-24 17:55 Woodruff, Robert J
2004-02-24 18:03 ` Greg KH
[not found] <mailman.1076018705.12618.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2004-02-09 1:51 ` Pete Zaitcev
2004-02-08 23:43 Arnd Bergmann
2004-02-08 21:36 Woodruff, Robert J
2004-02-06 4:07 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2004-02-05 23:09 Woodruff, Robert J
2004-02-05 22:55 Woodruff, Robert J
2004-02-05 22:54 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-02-05 22:26 Hefty, Sean
2004-02-05 22:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-05 22:39 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-02-05 23:19 ` Greg KH
2004-02-06 1:10 ` Troy Benjegerdes
2004-02-05 22:17 Tillier, Fabian
2004-02-05 22:56 ` Brian Gerst
2004-02-05 22:58 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2004-02-05 22:02 Tillier, Fabian
2004-02-06 1:57 ` Troy Benjegerdes
2004-02-05 20:32 Tillier, Fabian
2004-02-05 21:27 ` Greg KH
2004-02-05 21:56 ` Chris Friesen
2004-02-06 20:22 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-02-05 19:26 Tillier, Fabian
2004-02-05 20:27 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040206172709.GT11222@kalmia.hozed.org \
--to=hozer@hozed.org \
--cc=infiniband-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sean.hefty@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®