From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265094AbUBFRw6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 12:52:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265175AbUBFRw6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 12:52:58 -0500 Received: from hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.202.12]:32217 "HELO hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265094AbUBFRw5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 12:52:57 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 18:52:48 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: Christian Unger Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: psmouse.c, throwing 3 bytes away Message-ID: <20040206175248.GE26093@fs.tum.de> References: <4022BC15.4090502@wanadoo.es> <200402060702.15930.ctpm@rnl.ist.utl.pt> <200402062112.32212.chakkerz@optusnet.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200402062112.32212.chakkerz@optusnet.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 09:12:32PM +1100, Christian Unger wrote: >... > > The kernel is not tainted and was compiled with gcc 2.95.4. > What is a good version of GCC to use for all of this anyway ? Does / Should it > make a difference ? (It probably does, but should it?) gcc 2.95 is usually a good choice. But although it's unlikely, it would eliminate one possible problem if someone would check whether the problem still exists with a kernel that is compiled with e.g. gcc 3.3.2 . > with kind regards, > Christian Unger cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed