From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265379AbUBFKLk (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 05:11:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265374AbUBFKLk (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 05:11:40 -0500 Received: from mail015.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.161]:17875 "EHLO mail015.syd.optusnet.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265353AbUBFKLj (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 05:11:39 -0500 From: Christian Unger Reply-To: chakkerz@optusnet.com.au Organization: naiv.sourceforge.net To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: psmouse.c, throwing 3 bytes away Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 21:12:32 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <4022BC15.4090502@wanadoo.es> <200402060702.15930.ctpm@rnl.ist.utl.pt> In-Reply-To: <200402060702.15930.ctpm@rnl.ist.utl.pt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200402062112.32212.chakkerz@optusnet.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Hi, I think that's not really the problem. I'm not using KDE 3.2 and I > still have the problem. I'm running Debian unstable with XFree86 4.2.1 and > KDE 3.1.5. Could be that there was a change in KDE that is present in both 3.1.5 and 3.2.0 ... they are only 3 weeks appart. > The kernel is not tainted and was compiled with gcc 2.95.4. What is a good version of GCC to use for all of this anyway ? Does / Should it make a difference ? (It probably does, but should it?) -- with kind regards, Christian Unger -<< Contact Details >>- < > - < > - < > - < > - < > -<< Naiv Status >>- < > - Alt. Email: chakkerz_dev@optusnet.com.au | Stable: 0.2.3 r3 ICQ: 204184156 | Latest: 0.3.1 Mobile: 0402 268904 | Current: 0.3.2 Web: http://naiv.sourceforge.net | Focus: test images "You don't need eyes to see ... You need vision" (Faithless - Reverence)