From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266692AbUBFWfZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:35:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266809AbUBFWfZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:35:25 -0500 Received: from fed1mtao07.cox.net ([68.6.19.124]:8676 "EHLO fed1mtao07.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266692AbUBFWfT (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:35:19 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:35:17 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Pavel Machek Cc: akpm@osdl.org, george@mvista.com, amitkale@emsyssoft.com, Andi Kleen , jim.houston@comcast.net, Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: BitKeeper repo for KGDB Message-ID: <20040206223517.GD5219@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <20040127184029.GI32525@stop.crashing.org> <20040128165104.GC1200@elf.ucw.cz> <20040128170520.GI6577@stop.crashing.org> <20040128174402.GI340@elf.ucw.cz> <20040128175646.GJ6577@stop.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040128175646.GJ6577@stop.crashing.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:56:47AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 06:44:02PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: [snip] > > It's against 2.6 + -netpoll + Amit's patch. > > But doesn't -mm have a kgdb over enet driver that does work? It's just > not been ported to Amit's bits, right? OK. Based on this, and some other fixes, I've pushed my first cut of KGDB over ethernet. It's not quite as robust as I'd like right now (I'm still getting it just-right for connecting live), and I've got some not quite finished improvements still locally, but it does work. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/