From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265604AbUBGOBd (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Feb 2004 09:01:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265657AbUBGOBd (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Feb 2004 09:01:33 -0500 Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([213.86.99.234]:5907 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265604AbUBGOBb (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Feb 2004 09:01:31 -0500 Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:01:24 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: John Ogness Cc: Dave Jones , Michael Clark , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: File change notification Message-ID: <20040207140124.A29298@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , John Ogness , Dave Jones , Michael Clark , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <4024A1D8.9060700@antivir.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <4024A1D8.9060700@antivir.de>; from jogness@antivir.de on Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 09:29:12AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 09:29:12AM +0100, John Ogness wrote: > I am the current maintainer of Dazuko. Could you please explain your > "wackiest 2004" comment? Do you know of a better way to intercept system > calls for 2.2/2.4 kernels *without* patching the kernel source? better implies it's good - it isn't. In fact it's plain wrong for any kernel. Do a stackable filesystem if you want to intercept filesystem calls.