From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261492AbUBGXpd (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Feb 2004 18:45:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261506AbUBGXpc (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Feb 2004 18:45:32 -0500 Received: from almesberger.net ([63.105.73.238]:19729 "EHLO host.almesberger.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261492AbUBGXpb (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Feb 2004 18:45:31 -0500 Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 20:45:22 -0300 From: Werner Almesberger To: Andries Brouwer Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VFS locking: f_pos thread-safe ? Message-ID: <20040207204521.G18820@almesberger.net> References: <20040206041223.A18820@almesberger.net> <20040206215451.A2978@pclin040.win.tue.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040206215451.A2978@pclin040.win.tue.nl>; from aebr@win.tue.nl on Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 09:54:51PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andries Brouwer wrote: > The 2003 version can be found at > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/toc.htm > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/xsh_chap02_09.html Thanks a lot ! The wording is the same, so it seems that we don't comply with that part, at least not in the letter :-( - Werner -- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net / /_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/