From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261270AbUBGXLU (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Feb 2004 18:11:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261492AbUBGXLU (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Feb 2004 18:11:20 -0500 Received: from bristol.phunnypharm.org ([65.207.35.130]:24199 "EHLO bristol.phunnypharm.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261270AbUBGXLT (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Feb 2004 18:11:19 -0500 Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 18:08:17 -0500 From: Ben Collins To: Greg KH Cc: Robert Gadsdon , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: 2.6.2-mm1 aka "Geriatric Wombat" Message-ID: <20040207230817.GU1042@phunnypharm.org> References: <402240F9.3050607@gadsdon.giointernet.co.uk> <20040205182614.GG13075@kroah.com> <20040206144729.GJ1042@phunnypharm.org> <20040206182200.GE32116@kroah.com> <20040207172757.GQ1042@phunnypharm.org> <20040207191315.GC2581@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040207191315.GC2581@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > One thing I notice is that I am not checking the return value of > > device_register(), however if that fails, the device shouldn't be in the > > device list for the bus, correct? > > That is correct. I don't see the problem either in looking at your > code... Well, unless someone finds eveidence to the contrary, I'm going to assume this isn't a bug in ieee1394 :) -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/