From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261950AbUBHBqf (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Feb 2004 20:46:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261974AbUBHBqf (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Feb 2004 20:46:35 -0500 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:35218 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261950AbUBHBqe (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Feb 2004 20:46:34 -0500 Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 12:41:41 +1100 From: Anton Blanchard To: Nick Piggin Cc: Rick Lindsley , "Martin J. Bligh" , akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dvhltc@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Load balancing problem in 2.6.2-mm1 Message-ID: <20040208014141.GX19011@krispykreme> References: <20040207095057.GS19011@krispykreme> <200402080040.i180eY811893@owlet.beaverton.ibm.com> <20040208011221.GV19011@krispykreme> <40258F21.30209@cyberone.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40258F21.30209@cyberone.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Does active balancing still work? Ie. get two processes running on the > same physical CPU and see if one is migrated away. Both Ricks patch and your patch still have the active rebalance issue. Martins patch doesnt, but that seems to be because it does absolutely no rebalancing (all my runnable tasks are on one physical cpu) :) Anton