From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264553AbUBICCH (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Feb 2004 21:02:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264558AbUBICCH (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Feb 2004 21:02:07 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:54409 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264553AbUBICCF (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Feb 2004 21:02:05 -0500 Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 18:02:04 -0800 From: Pete Zaitcev To: David Woodhouse Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Infiniband thread(s) and etiquette. Message-Id: <20040208180204.15487072.zaitcev@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 22:58:00 +0000 David Woodhouse wrote: > However, people keep starting _new_ threads on the same subject. Dude, I was subscribed to Infiniband-general until a week ago, and I had to fish their messages out from +spam.html folder. This is quite beyond repair. Just killfile with subject regex and be done with it. > I think it's time the list started to automatically bounce messages with > 'Re: ' in the subject line but lacking any form of references. Might be a good idea, althoug you know, it's pretty tough to extract references if Nate's gateway at post-office ate them. And I cannot live without NNTP. -- Pete