From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
To: Andre Tomt <andre@tomt.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.3-rc1
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 02:34:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200402090234.20832.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4026CF98.5000905@tomt.net>
On Monday 09 of February 2004 01:08, Andre Tomt wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >>>Can you disassemble ide_pci_register_host_proc using gdb?
> >>
> >>I'd need a walkthrough, not very familiar with gdb other than getting a
> >>backtrace out of it
> >
> > Make sure to enable following options in kernel config:
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL ("Kernel hacking"->"Kernel debugging" ) and
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO ("Kernel debugging"->"Compile the kernel with debug
> > info").
> >
> > Recompile kernel.
> >
> > $ gdb /usr/src/linux/vmlinux
> > (gdb) disassemble ide_pci_register_host_proc
> >
> > That's all :-).
>
> Ahh. However, as ide-core is a module in this case, I had to run gdb on
> the module instead. Anyway..
Yep.
> (gdb) disassemble ide_pci_register_host_proc
> Dump of assembler code for function ide_pci_register_host_proc:
> 0xe940 <ide_pci_register_host_proc>: mov 0x4(%esp,1),%ecx
> 0xe944 <ide_pci_register_host_proc+4>: test %ecx,%ecx
> 0xe946 <ide_pci_register_host_proc+6>: je 0xe978
> <ide_pci_register_host_proc+56>
> 0xe948 <ide_pci_register_host_proc+8>: movl $0x0,0x10(%ecx)
> 0xe94f <ide_pci_register_host_proc+15>: movb $0x1,0x4(%ecx)
> 0xe953 <ide_pci_register_host_proc+19>: mov 0x3910,%eax
> 0xe958 <ide_pci_register_host_proc+24>: test %eax,%eax
> 0xe95a <ide_pci_register_host_proc+26>: je 0xe972
> <ide_pci_register_host_proc+50>
> 0xe95c <ide_pci_register_host_proc+28>: mov %eax,%edx
> 0xe95e <ide_pci_register_host_proc+30>: mov 0x10(%eax),%eax
> 0xe961 <ide_pci_register_host_proc+33>: test %eax,%eax
> 0xe963 <ide_pci_register_host_proc+35>: je 0xe96e
> <ide_pci_register_host_proc+46>
> 0xe965 <ide_pci_register_host_proc+37>: mov %eax,%edx
Access to ide_pci_proc_host_list->next.
> 0xe967 <ide_pci_register_host_proc+39>: mov 0x10(%eax),%eax
> 0xe96a <ide_pci_register_host_proc+42>: test %eax,%eax
> 0xe96c <ide_pci_register_host_proc+44>: jne 0xe965
> <ide_pci_register_host_proc+37>
> 0xe96e <ide_pci_register_host_proc+46>: mov %ecx,0x10(%edx)
> 0xe971 <ide_pci_register_host_proc+49>: ret
> 0xe972 <ide_pci_register_host_proc+50>: mov %ecx,0x3910
> 0xe978 <ide_pci_register_host_proc+56>: ret
> End of assembler dump.
Ok thanks, I got the same dump. I think the problem is that memory used by
previously registered ide_pci_host_proc_list entry (for pdc202xx_new driver)
is already unmapped because of __initdata in pdc202xx_new.h.
(This doesn't happen in built-in case because this memory is freed after
all drivers are initialized.)
Does this patch help?
linux-2.6.3-rc1-bk1-root/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_new.h | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_new.h~pdc202xx_old_oops drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_new.h
--- linux-2.6.3-rc1-bk1/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_new.h~pdc202xx_old_oops 2004-02-09 02:20:24.816898368 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.3-rc1-bk1-root/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_new.h 2004-02-09 02:20:57.167980256 +0100
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static u8 pdcnew_proc;
static int pdcnew_get_info(char *, char **, off_t, int);
-static ide_pci_host_proc_t pdcnew_procs[] __initdata = {
+static ide_pci_host_proc_t pdcnew_procs[] = {
{
.name = "pdcnew",
.set = 1,
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-09 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-07 2:28 Linus Torvalds
2004-02-07 2:56 ` viro
2004-02-07 17:21 ` Kevin O'Connor
2004-02-07 19:20 ` Greg KH
2004-02-07 3:11 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-07 5:26 ` Greg KH
2004-02-07 10:24 ` Andre Tomt
2004-02-07 16:22 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-02-08 6:02 ` Andre Tomt
2004-02-08 6:29 ` Andre Tomt
2004-02-08 21:34 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-02-08 21:55 ` Andre Tomt
2004-02-08 22:51 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-02-09 0:08 ` Andre Tomt
2004-02-09 1:34 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2004-02-09 2:40 ` Andre Tomt
2004-02-09 12:41 ` Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
2004-02-09 14:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-02-09 13:01 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-02-09 1:53 ` Disassembling with gdb (Re: Linux 2.6.3-rc1) Matthew Reppert
2004-02-08 15:18 ` Linux 2.6.3-rc1 Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200402090234.20832.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--to=b.zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=andre@tomt.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®