From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264446AbUBIJ3Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2004 04:29:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264449AbUBIJ3Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2004 04:29:16 -0500 Received: from userbb201.dsl.pipex.com ([62.190.241.201]:20446 "EHLO irishsea.home.craig-wood.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264446AbUBIJ3Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2004 04:29:16 -0500 Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:29:15 +0000 From: Nick Craig-Wood To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Does anyone still care about BSD ptys? Message-ID: <20040209092915.GA11305@axis.demon.co.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 07:17:27AM +0000, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Does anyone still care about old-style BSD ptys, i.e. /dev/pty*? I use them quite a lot for testing serial port stuff in shell scripts, eg connect one process which expects a serial port to /dev/ttys0 and another to /dev/ptys0. I expect there is a sane way of doing this new style pty's - I just don't know it! -- Nick Craig-Wood ncw1@axis.demon.co.uk