From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265756AbUBJHxD (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:53:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265763AbUBJHxD (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:53:03 -0500 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:57782 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265756AbUBJHxB (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:53:01 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:52:20 +0900 (JST) From: MAEDA Naoaki Subject: Re: [PATCH] packet_sendmsg_spkt incorrectly truncates an interface name In-reply-to: <20040209234341.0075159b.akpm@osdl.org> To: akpm@osdl.org Cc: maeda.naoaki@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-id: <20040210.165220.85391060.maeda@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 20.3 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Content-type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <20040210.163023.112606425.maeda@jp.fujitsu.com> <20040209234341.0075159b.akpm@osdl.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, > > Obviously, max name length of a network interface name is IFNAMESIZ-1, > > which is 15. > > Yes, but sockaddr_pkt.spkt_device[] is only 14 bytes for some reason. Oops! I have not checked it. Does anybody know the reason why it is only 14 bytes? Thanks, Naoaki