mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cliff white <cliffw@osdl.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Recent Reaim results (STP)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:04:16 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040210100416.0ba5cf6d.cliffw@osdl.org> (raw)


There hasn't been much big change in reaim runs lately,
but just to show we're Not Dead Yet, I
did some quick graphs for some recent kernels:
( 2.6.3-rc2 vs 2.6.2-rc3-mm1 ) 


http://developer.osdl.org/cliffw/reaim/compares/index.html

All tests were run on ext3. System descriptions here:
http://www.osdl.org/stp

Noteworthy: 2.6.3-rc2 is a tiny,tiny,itsy bit slower than 2.6.2.

	   2.6.3-rc1-mm1 is 5.79 percent faster than 2.6.3-rc2 on the
	2-way compute run. This is new - usually the results of
	the compute test do not differ between mainline and -mm.

Numbers: 


1-way
Database load
Kernel                    JPM     Lusers Pct Change
patch-2.6.3-rc2           1001.21   17  0.00
2.6.2-rc3-mm1             982.31   17 -1.89
linux-2.6.2               1000.03   17 -0.12

Compute load
patch-2.6.3-rc2           1025.48   17  0.00
2.6.2-rc3-mm1             1006.36   17 -1.86
linux-2.6.2               1024.82   17 -0.06

Fileserver load
patch-2.6.3-rc2           3741.72   62  0.00
2.6.3-rc1-mm1             3712.67   62 -0.78
linux-2.6.2               3748.21   63  0.17

2-way
Database load
patch-2.6.3-rc2           1285.31   22  0.00
2.6.3-rc1-mm1             1321.30   22  2.80
linux-2.6.2               1297.90   22  0.98

Compute load
patch-2.6.3-rc2           1446.99   26  0.00
2.6.3-rc1-mm1             1530.82   26  5.79
linux-2.6.2               1455.38   26  0.58

Fileserver  load
patch-2.6.3-rc2           6190.24  104  0.00
2.6.3-rc1-mm1             6123.20  102 -1.08
linux-2.6.2               6173.62  104 -0.27

4-way
Database load
patch-2.6.3-rc2           5288.33   88  0.00
2.6.2-rc3-mm1             5293.70   88  0.10
linux-2.6.2               5246.54   88 -0.79

Compute
patch-2.6.3-rc2           5169.71   88  0.00
2.6.2-rc3-mm1             5159.36   88 -0.20
linux-2.6.2               5206.06   88  0.70

Fileserver load
patch-2.6.3-rc2           10343.18  172  0.00
2.6.2-rc3-mm1             10254.39  168 -0.86
linux-2.6.2               10351.30  176  0.08

8-way
Database load ( Deadline scheduler )
patch-2.6.3-rc1           8591.23   88  0.00
2.6.2-rc3-mm1             9082.65  144  5.72
linux-2.6.2               8565.25  128 -0.30

Compute load
patch-2.6.3-rc1           9640.14  160 -0.11
2.6.2-rc3-mm1             9645.81  160 -0.05
linux-2.6.2               9711.96  160  0.63

cliffw
OSDL
-- 
The church is near, but the road is icy.
The bar is far, but i will walk carefully. - Russian proverb

                 reply	other threads:[~2004-02-10 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040210100416.0ba5cf6d.cliffw@osdl.org \
    --to=cliffw@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®