From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266135AbUBJUyc (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:54:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266152AbUBJUyb (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:54:31 -0500 Received: from madrid10.amenworld.com ([62.193.203.32]:58635 "EHLO madrid10.amenworld.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266135AbUBJUy3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:54:29 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:54:05 +0100 From: DervishD To: Michael Hayes Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Spelling in 2.6.2 Message-ID: <20040210205405.GB18085@DervishD> References: <200402102009.i1AK91T20554@aiinc.aiinc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200402102009.i1AK91T20554@aiinc.aiinc.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: Pleyades User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Michael :) * Michael Hayes dixit: > I was curious how fast spelling errors flow into the kernel, so I > looked at the + lines in the 2.6.2 patch. A few of the errors > already existed, but most of them are new. It turns out that there > are around 200 new spelling errors in 2.6.2. Has anybody done this for 2.4.x (or even 2.2.x, 2.0.x, etc...). Linux is good but... it should be 'pretty' too ;)) And of course, excuse my english O:) Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux Registered User 88736 http://www.pleyades.net & http://raul.pleyades.net/