From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Cc: Chris Mason <chris@k-rad.org>
Subject: Problem with 3c59x, WOL and Intel 440LX/EX or 430TX
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:07:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040211170727.GC18571@smtp.west.cox.net> (raw)
Hello. I believe I have tracked down a problem with the WOL support in
the 3c59x driver (2.6 varriant only right now). The problem has been
seen I belive by a few people:
(my own reports)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106297008218993&w=2
http://lkml.org/lkml/2003/9/2/167
I believe that the problem here is not with the driver per-se but with
the BIOS:
http://www.asus.com.tw/download/mbdriver/slot1-440lx.htm
The short description of the problem is that when the WOL code in the
driver is enabled, on some presumably buggy BIOSes the card ends up
getting put into the sleep state, or something as something like the
following gets reported as the driver inits:
3c59x: Donald Becker and others. www.scyld.com/network/vortex.html
See Documentation/networking/vortex.txt
0000:00:0e.0: 3Com PCI 3c905B Cyclone 100baseTx at 0xe480. Vers LK1.1.19
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:0e.0 to 64
ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, IRQ 9
product code ffff rev ffff.15 date 15-31-127
Full duplex capable
Internal config register is ffffffff, transceivers 0xffff.
1024K word-wide RAM 3:5 Rx:Tx split, autoselect/<invalid transceiver> interface.
***WARNING*** No MII transceivers found!
Enabling bus-master transmits and early receives.
0000:00:0e.0: scatter/gather enabled. h/w checksums enabled
If the patch in 1.1046.589.6 (key:
akpm@osdl.org|ChangeSet|20030801165536|51693) is reversed, the problem
goes away. But since that would be a drastic step for some buggy
BIOSes, would a patch to add in a disable_wol (and maybe a prink about
it, if no MII transceivers are found?) be an OK fix for this?
OTOH, this looks like bugme # 1394, and if so, it looks like there's a
number of buggy BIOS out there, so maybe it's not so drastic.
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
next reply other threads:[~2004-02-11 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-11 17:07 Tom Rini [this message]
2004-02-12 7:46 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040211170727.GC18571@smtp.west.cox.net \
--to=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=chris@k-rad.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®