From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266501AbUBLQ1a (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:27:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266509AbUBLQ1a (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:27:30 -0500 Received: from fed1mtao08.cox.net ([68.6.19.123]:55194 "EHLO fed1mtao08.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266501AbUBLQ13 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:27:29 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:27:27 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Andi Kleen Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amitkale@emsyssoft.com Subject: Re: [PATCH][6/6] A different KGDB stub Message-ID: <20040212162727.GO19676@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <20040212000408.GG19676@smtp.west.cox.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <20040212155055.GN19676@smtp.west.cox.net> <20040213040041.3e1ec2c2.ak@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040213040041.3e1ec2c2.ak@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 04:00:41AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:50:55 -0700 > Tom Rini wrote: > > > > Part of why I'm trying to get this into -mm is so that someone who has > > the hw and knowledge can try and merge some of the things that the other > > stubs got right into the stub that every arch can use. > > The kgdb stub in current -mm* does all the things I mentioned correctly. Yes, and it also makes every arch implement the entire stub and provide its own serial driver. Having said that, I'll try and pull out more of the things that the other stub gets right, but I don't have any x86_64 hw (nor toolchain) so I can't test any of the x86_64 changes I make. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/