From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266538AbUBLSv1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:51:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266540AbUBLSv0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:51:26 -0500 Received: from gate.in-addr.de ([212.8.193.158]:20391 "EHLO mx.in-addr.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266538AbUBLSuu (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:50:50 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:51:45 +0100 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree To: Joe Thornber Cc: Linux Mailing List Subject: Re: dm core patches Message-ID: <20040212185145.GY21298@marowsky-bree.de> References: <20040210163548.GC27507@reti> <20040211101659.GF3427@marowsky-bree.de> <20040211103541.GW27507@reti> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20040211103541.GW27507@reti> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Ctuhulu: HASTUR Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2004-02-11T10:35:41, Joe Thornber said: > > when will you be submitting the DM multipath personality? > Not for a bit, it's still changing too much as I find more out about > the hardware (see the dm-devel@redhat.com list). I checked the archives, but I couldn't find anything really 'in flux'. Your priority based approach seems just fine to me. What is still missing? This is really a killer feature for 2.6. Any help I can offer? Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Brée -- High Availability & Clustering \ ever tried. ever failed. no matter. SUSE Labs | try again. fail again. fail better. Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG \ -- Samuel Beckett