From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S266866AbUBMKD0 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 13 Feb 2004 05:03:26 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266882AbUBMKD0
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 13 Feb 2004 05:03:26 -0500
Received: from ss1000-dmz.ms.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.20.8]:18669 "EHLO
	ss1000.ms.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S266866AbUBMKDK (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 13 Feb 2004 05:03:10 -0500
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:02:57 +0100
From: Rudo Thomas <rudo@matfyz.cz>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bug, or is it? - SCHED_RR and FPU related
Message-ID: <20040213100257.GA19072@ss1000.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20040212205708.GA1679@ss1000.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <402C050B.2040803@cyberone.com.au> <20040213004727.GA20680@ss1000.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <402C2105.1030905@cyberone.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <402C2105.1030905@cyberone.com.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hello again.

> I think xmms changes the way it runs depending on whether realtime
> scheduling is set or not, but I could be wrong.

Yes, it does, but I am not sure whether this is the case.

Anyway, you were right, it was not the kernel. Nothing more to be seen here 8-)

Have a nice weekend.

Rudo.