From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266982AbUBMMof (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2004 07:44:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266986AbUBMMof (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2004 07:44:35 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:50638 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266982AbUBMMoe (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2004 07:44:34 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:44:32 +0000 From: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk To: Andrew Morton Cc: Giuliano Pochini , mhf@linuxmail.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PATCH, RFC: 2.6 Documentation/Codingstyle Message-ID: <20040213124432.GB8858@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <200402130615.10608.mhf@linuxmail.org> <20040213011012.12645046.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040213011012.12645046.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 01:10:12AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Yes, 80 cols sucks and the world would be a better place had CodingStyle > mandated 96 columns five years ago. But it didn't happen. Well, IBM had tried that once (System/3), but it didn't stick ;-)