From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265063AbUBOQHX (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:07:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265078AbUBOQHX (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:07:23 -0500 Received: from web14903.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.225.55]:46483 "HELO web14903.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265063AbUBOQHV (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:07:21 -0500 Message-ID: <20040215160719.44114.qmail@web14903.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:07:19 -0800 (PST) From: Jon Smirl Subject: Re: [BK PATCHES] 2.6.x libata update To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing Lists MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm running RAID-1 on ICH5, 82801EB. One SATA and one IDE drive in array. Hyperthread enabled CPU. Is this right? My ATA drive is on ide0. Because of the RAID my IDE and SATA drives should have about the same number of interrupts. But half of my IDE interrupts are showing up on ide1, on CPU #1. There shouldn't be any interrupts showing up on CPU#1 with hyperthreading. [root@smirl proc]# cat interrupts CPU0 CPU1 0: 2875672 0 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 1917 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 2: 0 0 XT-PIC cascade 8: 1 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc 9: 0 0 IO-APIC-level acpi 12: 50 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 14: 65443 0 IO-APIC-edge ide0 15: 59174 1 IO-APIC-edge ide1 16: 0 0 IO-APIC-level uhci_hcd, uhci_hcd 17: 688 0 IO-APIC-level Intel ICH5 18: 163152 0 IO-APIC-level libata, uhci_hcd, eth0 19: 54864 0 IO-APIC-level uhci_hcd 22: 3 0 IO-APIC-level ohci1394 23: 0 0 IO-APIC-level ehci_hcd NMI: 0 0 LOC: 2875702 2875706 ERR: 0 MIS: 0 ===== Jon Smirl jonsmirl@yahoo.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html