From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265732AbUBQCaq (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:30:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265875AbUBQCaq (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:30:46 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:40092 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265732AbUBQCap (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:30:45 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 18:31:43 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: paulmck@us.ibm.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: Non-GPL export of invalidate_mmap_range Message-Id: <20040216183143.512c3d5e.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040216190927.GA2969@us.ibm.com> References: <20040216190927.GA2969@us.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: > > The attached patch to make invalidate_mmap_range() non-GPL exported > seems to have been lost somewhere between 2.6.1-mm4 and 2.6.1-mm5. > It still applies cleanly. Could you please take it up again? I don't have any particular opinions either way but I do recall there was some disquiet last time this came up. I'm sure someone will remind us ;)