From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266169AbUBQNY1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:24:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266171AbUBQNY1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:24:27 -0500 Received: from ns.schottelius.org ([213.146.113.242]:62110 "HELO ns.schottelius.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S266169AbUBQNYZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:24:25 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 14:24:30 +0100 From: Nico Schottelius To: Nico Schottelius Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: usb issue in 2.6 or notebook defect? Message-ID: <20040217132430.GZ1881@schottelius.org> References: <20040217110840.GR1881@schottelius.org> <20040217110928.GS1881@schottelius.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040217110928.GS1881@schottelius.org> X-Linux-Info: http://linux.schottelius.org/ X-Operating-System: Linux bruehe 2.6.1 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Still on it... I asked some other people who all could confirmed that after copying much data (>=1-2GB) to/from a usb disk, the copy/tar/ whatever will freeze and then you'll have to reconnect the device to use it again (in my case with devfs the old entries still exist and the second time it become sdb) Is it really still a problem to use mass storage under Linux? Greetings, Nico