From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266621AbUBQXsr (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2004 18:48:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266573AbUBQXsr (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2004 18:48:47 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:8646 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266695AbUBQXsp (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2004 18:48:45 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:50:36 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Tom Rini Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][1/6] A different KGDB stub Message-Id: <20040217155036.33e37c67.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040217220249.GB16881@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <20040217220249.GB16881@smtp.west.cox.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tom Rini wrote: > > The following is the core bits to this KGDB stub. This still contains the kern_do_schedule() gunk. Andi raised this issue last week. He identified several other significant issues as well, but there was no followup. Could you please dig out his email and address the points which he raised? (I can't find the email - perhaps Andi could re-review this patch?)