From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: module unload deadlock
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 18:26:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040217172646.GT4478@dualathlon.random> (raw)
I've got bugreports for a deadlock due semaphore recursion in the module
unload code of 2.6.
You considered the recursion issue for the ->init but not for the
->exit.
sys_delete_module calls ->exit with the mutex held, cleanup_module calls
request_module(), modprobe reads /proc/modules and it deadlocks on the
mutex. This results in rmmod deadlocking and all the module subsystem
hung.
the actual module doing request_modules in the cleanup handler is
parport_pc, calling parport_enumerate (it calls it for another reason,
and parport enumerate is told to load up a lowlevel driver if none was
present, that's worthless for the unload routine but it's useful for all
other calls of parport_enumerate). It's uncertain if other drivers
triggers this deadlock.
This untested two liner will fix it, it's not obviously safe, but it
looks like safe thanks to the MODULE_STATE_GOING read inside the
critical sections protected by the mutex (like in
strong_try_module_get), and if this is not safe the module loading
probably wouldn't be safe either in presence of ->init failures. If it's
not completely safe still it can be made safe using MODULE_STATE_GOING.
It would be possible to fix this problem also by passing a parameter to
parport_enumerate, to avoid calling request_module if invoked within the
cleanup_module routine, but the below looks more generic and it looks
like the module code is already robust enough to handle such lock-drop,
so I guess it's preferable.
Comments?
--- SLES/kernel/module.c.~1~ 2004-02-12 17:24:42.000000000 +0100
+++ SLES/kernel/module.c 2004-02-17 18:08:05.519670280 +0100
@@ -732,7 +732,9 @@ sys_delete_module(const char __user *nam
wait_for_zero_refcount(mod);
/* Final destruction now noone is using it. */
+ up(&module_mutex);
mod->exit();
+ down(&module_mutex);
free_module(mod);
out:
next reply other threads:[~2004-02-17 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-17 17:26 Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2004-02-18 3:29 ` Rusty Russell
2004-02-18 4:35 ` viro
2004-02-18 15:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-18 16:46 ` viro
2004-02-18 17:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-18 17:37 ` viro
2004-02-18 17:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040217172646.GT4478@dualathlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®