From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266559AbUBQUsD (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:48:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266587AbUBQUsD (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:48:03 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:22199 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266559AbUBQUsA (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:48:00 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:47:58 +0000 From: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk To: John Bradford Cc: Jamie Lokier , Linus Torvalds , Marc , Marc Lehmann , Linux kernel Subject: Re: UTF-8 practically vs. theoretically in the VFS API (was: Re: JFS default behavior) Message-ID: <20040217204758.GS8858@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <20040216222618.GF18853@mail.shareable.org> <20040217071448.GA8846@schmorp.de> <20040217163613.GA23499@mail.shareable.org> <20040217175209.GO8858@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20040217192917.GA24311@mail.shareable.org> <20040217195348.GQ8858@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <200402172035.i1HKZM4j000154@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200402172035.i1HKZM4j000154@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:35:22PM +0000, John Bradford wrote: > Why not: [snip a massive pile of idiocy] > * Note that this is very different to my last suggestion, which was > fundamentally broken in many ways. So is that one. To the level of Hohensee and RBJ. *plonk*