From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266818AbUBQXNu (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2004 18:13:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266826AbUBQXNu (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2004 18:13:50 -0500 Received: from fed1mtao06.cox.net ([68.6.19.125]:21995 "EHLO fed1mtao06.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266818AbUBQXNq (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2004 18:13:46 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:13:44 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Pavel Machek Cc: kernel list Subject: Re: [PATCH][6/6] A different KGDB stub Message-ID: <20040217231344.GK16881@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <20040217220456.GG16881@smtp.west.cox.net> <20040217223040.GA1560@elf.ucw.cz> <20040217223817.GJ16881@smtp.west.cox.net> <20040217230855.GB1560@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040217230855.GB1560@elf.ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:08:55AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > The following is the x86_64-specific bits to this KGDB stub (Pavel, can > > > > you give this a try please? Thanks). > > > > > > I can only see [0/6],[1/6] and [6/6] on l-k. Could you perhaps mail me > > > complete diff against 2.6.2 to try? [Or against some other version I > > > can get from kernel.org...) > > > > I'll blame the slow mailserver and hope they all get through > > eventually. > > Yes, now only #2 is missing :-))). > > > The following is the patch before I split it up. Against 2.6.3-rc4 + > > bk-netdev from 2.6.3-rc3-mm1 (otherwise kgdboe won't work at all): > > I'll try without kgdboe, first. > > I'm getting some compile errors, stay tuned. I'm not surprised, sadly. > Meanwhile: [and taking this public] > > arch/x86_64/kernel/x86_64-stub.c: this is really horrible name for a > file. Can we have arch/x86_64/kernel/kgdb.c? or kgdb-stub.c at worst.. > > also kernel/kgdb.c sounds better than kernel/kgdbstub.c. Don't look at me for naming, when in doubt I call stuff 'simple' (see arch/ppc/boot/simple, or CONFIG_PPC_SIMPLE_SERIAL, and I'm sure I'll do it again). If people like kernel/kgdb.c (and arch/$(ARCH)/kernel/kgdb.c or kgdb-stub.c) that's fine with me, so long as they're all consistent. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/