From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263606AbUBRHZX (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 02:25:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263607AbUBRHZX (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 02:25:23 -0500 Received: from outpost.ds9a.nl ([213.244.168.210]:40588 "EHLO outpost.ds9a.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263606AbUBRHZT (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 02:25:19 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:25:13 +0100 From: bert hubert To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: UTF-8 practically vs. theoretically in the VFS API Message-ID: <20040218072513.GA10446@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mail-Followup-To: bert hubert , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <04Feb13.163954est.41760@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca> <200402161948.i1GJmJi5000299@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> <20040216202142.GA5834@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 02:58:42AM +0000, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Indeed. The original name for the encoding was, in fact, "FSS-UTF", > for "filesystem safe Unicode transformation format." That might explain a few things. > > F8 80 80 80 AE F8 80 80 80 AE > > FC 80 80 80 80 AE FC 80 80 80 80 AE > > No, they don't. Serves me right for trusting a random site, apologies. -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software http://lartc.org Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO