From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267439AbUBRStL (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:49:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267821AbUBRStL (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:49:11 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:44199 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267439AbUBRStH (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:49:07 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:50:16 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Rusty Russell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.3-mm1 Message-Id: <20040218105016.44ca830c.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040218135623.112C92C3B8@lists.samba.org> References: <20040218012553.1228ae34.akpm@osdl.org> <20040218135623.112C92C3B8@lists.samba.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rusty Russell wrote: > > Do you want me to consolidate the patches in your tree? At the moment > you're carrying: > > kthread-primitive.patch > kthread-affinity-fix.patch > kthread-affinity-fix-fix.patch > kthread-handle-non-booting-CPUs.patch > kthread-stop-using-signals.patch > > Which are logically a single "kthread-without-signals" patch. Is OK, thanks - that is merely a matter of typing `joinpatch $(nextpatch); drop-patch $(nextpatch)' four times. I generally keep these things separated for quite a long time because it aids in the binary-search-to-see-what-broke-it game.