From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266517AbUBSHpk (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2004 02:45:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266555AbUBSHpk (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2004 02:45:40 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:39301 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266517AbUBSHpj (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2004 02:45:39 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:41:56 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Steve Lord Cc: Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kenneth.w.chen@intel.com Subject: Re: Limit hash table size Message-ID: <20040218124156.GA467@openzaurus.ucw.cz> References: <20040205155813.726041bd.akpm@osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <4021AC9F.4090408@xfs.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4021AC9F.4090408@xfs.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > Hmm, looks like Pavel maybe just hit something along these lines... > see > > '2.6.2 extremely unresponsive after rsync backup' > I tried to reproduce it and I could not. Not sure what went wrong that night, but it does not want to happen again. -- 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms