From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264455AbUBRNNa (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:13:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264473AbUBRNN3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:13:29 -0500 Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([213.86.99.234]:54281 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264455AbUBRNN2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:13:28 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:13:19 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Andy Whitcroft Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Non-GPL export of invalidate_mmap_range Message-ID: <20040218131319.A8603@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Andy Whitcroft , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20040216190927.GA2969@us.ibm.com> <20040217073522.A25921@infradead.org> <24651326.1077037044@42.150.104.212.access.eclipse.net.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <24651326.1077037044@42.150.104.212.access.eclipse.net.uk>; from apw@shadowen.org on Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 04:57:24PM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 04:57:24PM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > Harsh, when you consider the biggest protagonist in the Linux market place > is suing their arse off speficically for contributing stuff to Linux. > Lawyer overload is bound to be involved in the delays. So the good ones are allowed to violate the GPL and that bad ones not? What a logic and have fun trying to explain that to a judge.