From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264442AbUBRQVG (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:21:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267071AbUBRQVG (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:21:06 -0500 Received: from mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk ([212.104.129.88]:12499 "EHLO mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264442AbUBRQVC convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:21:02 -0500 From: Ian Hastie To: mru@kth.se (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns?= =?iso-8859-1?q?=20Rullg=E5rd?=), Ian Hastie Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.3 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:20:46 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200402181417.06553.ianh@iahastie.local.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200402181620.48040.ianh@iahastie.local.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 18 Feb 2004 14:26, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Ian Hastie writes: > > On Wednesday 18 Feb 2004 10:07, Måns Rullgård wrote: > >> Linus Torvalds writes: > >> > Ok, it's out. > >> > > >> > There were some minimal changes relative to the last -rc4, mostly some > >> > configuration and build fixes, but a few important one-liners too. > >> > >> What? No new code name? > > > > I suppose that'll come with the first 2.6.4-rc#. > > That's not logical. 2.6.2 was "Feisty Dunnart", so 2.6.3 should have > a new name. I had thought it was 2.6.3-rc1 that had the name first. Having checked I see I was wrong and new name was definitely called for. Unless, of course, this is the 2.6 series name now. -- Ian.