From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264481AbUBRQa2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:30:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266510AbUBRQa1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:30:27 -0500 Received: from ee.oulu.fi ([130.231.61.23]:49106 "EHLO ee.oulu.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264481AbUBRQaZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:30:25 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:30:15 +0200 From: Flexy To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Laptop problems with 2.4 & 2.6 (HP Omnibook 4150) Message-ID: <20040218163015.GA10416@ee.oulu.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2.4.23 kernel, keventd is not using much CPU time, but on 2.4.25-pre8 keventd is taking upto same amount as X. The difference is atleast a decade or two. The configurations of these kernels are the same. On 2.6.3 kernel, events/0 is taking CPU time, much like keventd in 2.4.25-pre8. I'm using vanilla kernels from kernel.org on HP Omnibook 4150, PIII 500, with BX chipset. 256MB memory, 3c589_cs. I'm happy to provide any additional information and do some testing, if needed. Remember to put me on cc-list, I'm not subscribed. TIA, Flexy