From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267969AbUBRThH (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:37:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267967AbUBRThH (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:37:07 -0500 Received: from gprs156-45.eurotel.cz ([160.218.156.45]:20354 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267966AbUBRThD (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:37:03 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:36:24 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Tom Rini Cc: Andrew Morton , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH][1/6] A different KGDB stub Message-ID: <20040218193624.GA408@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20040217220249.GB16881@smtp.west.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040217220249.GB16881@smtp.west.cox.net> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > The following is the core bits to this KGDB stub. What are those weak functions good for? Can't we simply assume that any architecture that allows CONFIG_KGDB provides neccessary functions? Pavel PS: Also.. how to proceed? Should I split your patches into "normal" and "lite" parts and submit to Amit? -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]