From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267161AbUBRXW2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:22:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267123AbUBRXWG (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:22:06 -0500 Received: from vsmtp14.tin.it ([212.216.176.118]:63954 "EHLO vsmtp14.tin.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267161AbUBRXVb (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:21:31 -0500 From: Marco Gulino To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.3: lilo warnings Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:21:19 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <200402182353.41899.rockman81@tin.it> <4033F069.1050206@ihateaol.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4033F069.1050206@ihateaol.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200402190021.19022.rockman81@tin.it> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I also upgraded from 2.6.2 to 2.6.3 on Slack 9.1 today and received no > such warnings. What's in your lilo.conf? It's the default from liloconfig... i only modified labels and image names... nothing else... and lilo too is the one installed with slack 9.1, i didn't modified or upgraded it. Hi :-)