From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261846AbUBWNXR (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 08:23:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261849AbUBWNXQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 08:23:16 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:59830 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261846AbUBWNXN (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 08:23:13 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:34:11 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Hod McWuff Cc: Len Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: HT CPU handling - 2.6.2 Message-ID: <20040219183410.GF467@openzaurus.ucw.cz> References: <1076391435.4103.730.camel@dhcppc4> <1076395641.2246.5.camel@siberian.wuff.dhs.org> <1076397803.4105.900.camel@dhcppc4> <1076402910.2577.3.camel@siberian.wuff.dhs.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1076402910.2577.3.camel@siberian.wuff.dhs.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > OK then the heck with the flag... am I to understand that there is in > fact a partial CPU on the die? (LAPIC but no other logic?) Or is the > second CPU instance there and real but administratively disabled? > If I read it correctly, you have two logical CPUs there, but one of them is administratively disabled. You can't enable it without some serious tools. -- 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms