From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: "Bill Rugolsky Jr." <brugolsky@telemetry-investments.com>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
brugolsky@telemetry-investments.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][2/4] poll()/select() timeout behavior
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 19:58:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040220195840.36b3a76e.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040220210221.GC1912@ti19.telemetry-investments.com>
"Bill Rugolsky Jr." <brugolsky@telemetry-investments.com> wrote:
>
> This patch cause select() to return EINVAL when passed an un-normalized
> timeval usec
Why? The current behaviour is to do the right thing when passed a tv_usec
which is greater than 1,000,000. Why not retain that?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-21 3:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-20 21:02 Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2004-02-21 3:58 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040220195840.36b3a76e.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=brugolsky@telemetry-investments.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®